CVE-2018-6498
Remote Code Execution in the following products Hybrid Cloud Management Containerized Suite HCM2017.11, HCM2018.02, HCM2018.05, Operations Bridge Containerized Suite 2017.11, 2018.02, 2018.05, Data Center Automation Containerized Suite 2017.01 until 2018.05, Service Management Automation Suite 2017.11, 2018.02, 2018.05 and Network Operations Management (NOM) Suite CDF 2017.11, 2018.02, 2018.05 will allow Remote Code Execution.
Published : 2018-08-30 21:29 Updated : 2019-10-09 23:41
CVSS Score
More info
Score 7.5 / 10
A vulnerability exploitable with network access means the vulnerable software is bound to the network stack and the attacker does not require local network access or local access. Such a vulnerability is often termed "remotely exploitable". An example of a network attack is an RPC buffer overflow.
Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. The following are examples:
- The affected product typically requires access to a wide range of systems and users, possibly anonymous and untrusted (e.g., Internet-facing web or mail server).
- The affected configuration is default or ubiquitous.
- The attack can be performed manually and requires little skill or additional information gathering.
- The race condition is a lazy one (i.e., it is technically a race but easily winnable).
Authentication is not required to exploit the vulnerability.
There is considerable informational disclosure. Access to some system files is possible, but the attacker does not have control over what is obtained, or the scope of the loss is constrained. An example is a vulnerability that divulges only certain tables in a database.
Modification of some system files or information is possible, but the attacker does not have control over what can be modified, or the scope of what the attacker can affect is limited. For example, system or application files may be overwritten or modified, but either the attacker has no control over which files are affected or the attacker can modify files within only a limited context or scope.
There is reduced performance or interruptions in resource availability. An example is a network-based flood attack that permits a limited number of successful connections to an Internet service.
| Vendor | Product | Version | URI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microfocus | Data Center Automation | 2017.01 | cpe:/a:microfocus:data_center_automation:2017.01 |
| Microfocus | Data Center Automation | 2017.05 | cpe:/a:microfocus:data_center_automation:2017.05 |
| Microfocus | Data Center Automation | 2017.08 | cpe:/a:microfocus:data_center_automation:2017.08 |
| Microfocus | Data Center Automation | 2017.09 | cpe:/a:microfocus:data_center_automation:2017.09 |
| Microfocus | Data Center Automation | 2017.11 | cpe:/a:microfocus:data_center_automation:2017.11 |
| Microfocus | Data Center Automation | 2018.02 | cpe:/a:microfocus:data_center_automation:2018.02 |
| Microfocus | Data Center Automation | 2018.05 | cpe:/a:microfocus:data_center_automation:2018.05 |
| Microfocus | Hybrid Cloud Management | 2017.11 | cpe:/a:microfocus:hybrid_cloud_management:2017.11::~~premium~~~ |
| Microfocus | Hybrid Cloud Management | 2017.11 | cpe:/a:microfocus:hybrid_cloud_management:2017.11::~~ultimate~~~ |
| Microfocus | Hybrid Cloud Management | 2018.02 | cpe:/a:microfocus:hybrid_cloud_management:2018.02::~~premium~~~ |
| Microfocus | Hybrid Cloud Management | 2018.02 | cpe:/a:microfocus:hybrid_cloud_management:2018.02::~~ultimate~~~ |
| Microfocus | Hybrid Cloud Management | 2018.05 | cpe:/a:microfocus:hybrid_cloud_management:2018.05::~~premium~~~ |
| Microfocus | Hybrid Cloud Management | 2018.05 | cpe:/a:microfocus:hybrid_cloud_management:2018.05::~~ultimate~~~ |
| Microfocus | Network Operations Management | 2017.11 | cpe:/a:microfocus:network_operations_management:2017.11 |
| Microfocus | Network Operations Management | 2018.02 | cpe:/a:microfocus:network_operations_management:2018.02 |
| Microfocus | Network Operations Management | 2018.05 | cpe:/a:microfocus:network_operations_management:2018.05::~~premium~~~ |
| Microfocus | Operations Bridge | 2017.11 | cpe:/a:microfocus:operations_bridge:2017.11::~~premium~~~ |
| Microfocus | Operations Bridge | 2018.02 | cpe:/a:microfocus:operations_bridge:2018.02::~~premium~~~ |
| Microfocus | Operations Bridge | 2018.05 | cpe:/a:microfocus:operations_bridge:2018.05::~~premium~~~ |
| Microfocus | Service Management Automation | 2017.11 | cpe:/a:microfocus:service_management_automation:2017.11 |
| Microfocus | Service Management Automation | 2018.02 | cpe:/a:microfocus:service_management_automation:2018.02 |
| Microfocus | Service Management Automation | 2018.05 | cpe:/a:microfocus:service_management_automation:2018.05 |
-
Microfocus (5) Search CVE
-
Service Management Automation (3) Search CVE
-
2017.11
-
2018.02
-
2018.05
-
-
Data Center Automation (7) Search CVE
-
2017.01
-
2017.05
-
2017.08
-
2017.09
-
2017.11
-
2018.02
-
2018.05
-
-
Hybrid Cloud Management (3) Search CVE
-
2017.11
-
2018.02
-
2018.05
-
-
Network Operations Management (3) Search CVE
-
2017.11
-
2018.02
-
2018.05
-
-
Operations Bridge (3) Search CVE
-
2017.11
-
2018.02
-
2018.05
-
-
CWE
| ID | Name | Description | Links | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWE-94 | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') | The software constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. | CVE | |
References
History of changes
| Date | Event | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-13 18:28 |
22 added
5 changed
|
||||||||||
| 2018-08-30 21:29 |
New CVE |